who we are?

Cognizance Journal is a Multidisciplinary International, Peer Reviewed, Open Access, Scientific and Scholarly Journal which Publishes Research Papers, Review Papers, Mini Reviews, Case Reports, Case Studies, Short Communications, Letters, Editorials, etc., from all the Disciplines.

After Publishing, Articles are freely available through online without any restrictions or any other subscriptions to researchers and readers worldwide.

why choose us ?

Cognizance Journal is Well Indexed, Open Accessible, Multidisciplinary and CrossRef Member.

Open Access

CrossRef DOI assigning to all published papers

Papers can be published in any field

Advantages of publishing in Cognizance Journal

1. Best Quality Research Works are preferable

2. If your paper is accepted, no need to wait longer because its a monthly journal and we guarantee to do the review process as quick as possible

3. Cognizance Journal runs online on reputed web host, hence data is available at any time and probability of unavailability is NIL

4. All Authors will be given E-certificates without extra fee

5. All Articles will be assigned DOIs from CrossRef

Review Process

review procedure

Publication Ethics

Role of Editors: The role of the editors is to evaluate the suitability of submitted manuscripts for the journal, including: (a) the quality of the manuscript, (b) whether it meets the Aims and Scope of the journal, and (c) the originality of the work. The editors will not disclose information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers or potential reviewers, or other members of the editorial board. Editors will ensure the prompt handling of the review process. Editors will evaluate the merit of manuscripts for intellectual content without regard to race, gender, country of origin, ethnicity, religion, or sexual orientation.

Role of Reviewers: Peer review is essential to the journal in assisting in making editorial decisions and assisting authors in manuscript improvement. Reviewers should point out relevant publications not cited in the manuscript and point out any similarities with previously published works. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts with conflicts of interest, competitive, financial, or collaborative. If a potential reviewer feels unqualified to review the manuscript, that reviewer should notify the editors immediately and decline the review. Manuscripts received for review will be treated as confidential documents and not shown or discussed with other without authorization from the editors. Authors should expect to receive reviewer reports in a prompt manner, normally within three weeks. Reviewer misconduct (breach of confidentiality, delay of peer review, plagiarism, or conflicts of interest) will not be tolerated.

Role of Authors: Authors of original research (not previously published or under consideration for publication elsewhere) should be an accurate presentation of the work carried out, a discussion of the significance of the work in context with previous works, and should contain sufficient experimental detail to allow others to replicate the work. Appropriate citation of previously published works must always be included. Authors should disclose any financial or other conflicts of interest that may be construed as influencing the data or interpretation. All sources of financial support should be disclosed. Authorship should be limited to those persons who have made a significant contribution to the work in terms of conception, design, experimental implementation, and data analysis and interpretation. All persons making significant contributions should be included as co-authors. If an author discovers a significant error in the published work, the author is obligated to inform the journal editor in order to either correct or retract the paper.

Role of the Publisher: In cases of proven scientific misconduct, plagiarism, or fraudulent publication, the publisher, in collaboration with the editorial board, will take appropriate action to clarify the situation, publish an erratum, or retract the work in question.
- Cognizance Journal